Apr 29, | Humanities
INSTRUCTIONS:
In this fourth and final journal entry, take a synthetic look at the issue, to assess the impact of McDonaldization in your life.
First, think about how much McDonaldization you think is present in your life, providing some examples.
Then, consider whether you would like this to change, by reflecting on the positive and negative consequences of McDonaldization for you, including a consideration of our core value of community. You may want to focus on only one or two changes.
Finally, think about how you might go about implementing such change(s), also thinking how that might relate to the core value of community.
IMPORTANT REMINDERS:
It should be 3 pages long using a 12-point size font, double- spaced.
You should use a header with your name, the date, the course number, and “Journal Entry 4” on the first page.
You should cite and reference your textbook properly in a standard formatting style, such as ASA, APA, or MLA.
The first two pages should be your essay, and the third page should be your reference list.
Apr 29, | Humanities
I need someone to write essay for meread the requirement and do in order
You will create an overview of each of four ethical theories in relation to a particular
case, and assess the pros and cons of each theory in determining the ethics, and
identify policy vacuum or any conceptual muddles.
Details:
Using the case that your house or group accessed in session 3.1, you will look at
each of four ethical Frameworks, similarly to the way we did it in class on the ethical
framework worksheet. You will look at deontology, utilitarianism, ethics of care, and
Rawlsian justice. You will identify the factors at play: conceptual muddles, policy
vacuums, or Faustian Bargains.
Then for each framework you will look at the pros and cons of using that framework
to determine the ethics of that case. You will do this as Tavani describes his method
for assessing ethics. Describe which factors would be relevant to determining the
ethical behavior in the case for each framework. For example if you are evaluating
the case according to utilitarianism, what is the greatest good in this case? Or if you
are looking at deontology, what is your duty? And how do you express that duty
while keeping in mind the categorical imperative? What sort of care might be
associated with the case? And who might be the group of people that is the least
well off in the case? These are the types of factors you should consider as you write.
The essay should be between 500 and 800 words. APA formatted in-text citations
and reference list. The actual paper should just be an easy to read font such as
Georgia, Gill Sans, Minion, etc. 12 point and either single or double spaced is fine.
Please don’t put your name in the main text of the document.
You will turn this assignment in on canvas in the appropriate drop box.
This is the checklist/rubric by which we will be assessing the assignment:
Checklist/Rubric for Ethical Theories
Assignment
•
Introduces the case, including the Faustian Bargain(s) in this case, .25 pts.
•
Briefly notes any conceptual muddles and policy vaccum .25 pts.
•
o
•
Total out of .5 pts.______
Utilitarianism is discussed relative to the case, including:
o
Which “greatest good” has been identified as most relevant, .25 pts.
o
Lists at least one positive and one negative about using utilitarianism to
assess the ethics of the case, .25 pts.
o
Makes SURE to keep eudaimonia in mind when making this assessment, .25
pts
o
Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using utilitarian
framework, .25 pts.
▪
•
Total out of 1 pt.______
Deontology is discussed relative to the case, including:
o
Which “duty” has been identified as most relevant, .25 pts.
o
Discusses the categorical imperative (both the part about universality and
using people as a means to an end), .5 pts.
o
Lists at least one positive & one negative about using deontology to assess
the ethics of the case, .25 pts.
o
Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using deontology, .25 pts.
▪
•
Total out of 1.25 pt.______
Ethics of care is discussed relative to the case, including:
o
Notes what sort of care has been identified as most relevant, and for whom,
.25 pts.
o
Determines whether the person doing the action or creating the
policy/system able to provide care for them, both in terms of giving of
yourself and in terms of their ability? .25 pts.
o
States whether the people you think want to be cared for want the proposed
care? Be sure to assess the person’s vulnerability and inequality by listening
to THEM, as opposed to imagining yourself in a similar situation, .25 pts.
o
Lists at least one positive and one negative about using ethics of care to
assess the ethics of the case, .25 pts.
o
Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using ethics of care, .25 pts.
▪
•
Total out of 1.25 pts.______
The Rawlsian justice framework is discussed relative to the case, including:
o
Shows which group or groups have been identified as most likely to be the
“least well-off”, .25 pts.
o
Shows whether people have a fair chance of obtaining the advantage, if there
is one, .25 pts.
o
Lists at least one positive & one negative about using the Rawlsian justice
framework to assess the ethics of the case, .25 pts.
o
Determines that the case is ethical or not ethical using the Rawlsian justice
framework, .25 pts.
▪
Total out of 1 pt.______
Length: Is the essay fewer than 500 words? Subtract 1 point for every 0-100 words
fewer than 500 (400-499=Subtract 1; 300-399=subtract 2; 200-299=subtract 3; and
so on). Subtract___________
Spelling, grammar, or syntax errors, subtract 0.25 pts for each over 4. (each person
gets 4 “free” errors, then they “cost” 0.25 pts each) Subtract___________
Muddled writing? Take 0.5 pts off for any individual instance of writing too muddled
or confusing to understand. Subtract___________
Total points earned out of 5: ____________
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
