Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
Hospital acquired infections are common in most hospital settings particularly in the surgical, critical care unit, intensive care unit and the emergency department. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) statistics, over 2 million hospitalized patients get hospital-acquired infections when receiving treatment (Adegboye et al., 2018). This necessitates organizational readiness and cultural changes focused on resolving this problem. In my organization, the level of preparedness is evident in the culture whereby an adequate nurse patient ratio is maintained to prevent chain transmission through multiple provider contact. Protocols have also been put in place to ensure high hygiene standards. However, an implementation barrier exists following lack of…
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
In order to formulate your evidence-based practice (EBP), you need to assess your organization. In this assignment, you will be responsible for setting the stage for EBP. This assignment is conducted in two parts: an organizational cultural and readiness assessment and the proposal/problem statement and literature review, which you completed in NUR-550.
ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
It is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation. Select an appropriate organizational culture survey tool and use this instrument to assess the organization’s readiness. Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
Develop an analysis of 250 words from the results of the survey, addressing your organization’s readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, and how to integrate clinical inquiry, providing strategies that strengthen the organization’s weaker areas.

Make sure to include the rationale for the survey category scores that were significantly high and low, incorporating details or examples. Explain how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization.

Submit a summary of your results. The actual survey results do not need to be included.

Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
In NUR-550, you developed a PICOT statement and literature review for a population quality initiative. In 500-750 words, include the following:
Refine your PICOT into a proposal or problem statement.

Provide a summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations. Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review

General Guidelines:
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Note: After submitting the assignment, you will receive feedback from the instructor. Use this feedback to make revisions for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section. Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal
Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
Hospital acquired infections are common in most hospital settings particularly in the surgical, critical care unit, intensive care unit and the emergency department. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) statistics, over 2 million hospitalized patients get hospital-acquired infections when receiving treatment (Adegboye et al., 2018). This necessitates organizational readiness and cultural changes focused on resolving this problem. In my organization, the level of preparedness is evident in the culture whereby an adequate nurse patient ratio is maintained to prevent chain transmission through multiple provider contact. Protocols have also been put in place to ensure high hygiene standards. However, an implementation barrier exists following lack of policies reinforcing these protocols. Limited resources such as water also increase the risk of HAIs and undermine implementation.
Integration of clinical inquiry in a healthcare organization forms a basis for resolution of healthcare problems. This has helped understand the causes of increased cases of HAIs and encouraged brainstorm in seeking for the most effective solution. Through this, the hospital has been able to employ interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration efforts in recognizing the importance of handwashing in the effective control of infectious disease transmission in the facility (Keller, McMillion & Ammon, 2018). According to experts, hands provide a relevant pathogen transmission route due to the frequency of contact with the other body parts as well as other people and external factors such as surfaces. Clinical inquiry is essential in healthcare in pursuit of understanding the pathology of communicable diseases and how multi-drug resistant infectious diseases are spread from one person to another in hospitals (Fox et al., 2015).
Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
Clinical Question/PICOT Statement
Among hospitalized patients aged 18 years or older (P), how does washing hands using soap and water (I) compared to using hand sanitizers(C), help to reduce incidences of HAIs (O) within 3 months (T)?
Summary of research
More specifically, in the US, one out of 136 patients gets seriously ill because of HAIs. This equates to 1.7 million cases annually causing additional costs of between US$ 4.0–5.0 billion and an estimated 90 000 deaths (Haverstick et al., 2017). In most hospitals, handwashing is the most important and effective infection control procedure that prevents transmission of pathogens from person to person. According to the findings by the World Health Organization (WHO), handwashing with soap and water has a scientific basis and the most appropriate intervention that reduces the transmission costs of pathogens and the rates of HAIs (Haverstick et al., 2017). When combined with other infection control strategies, handwashing produces better results. Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
The population within 18 years of age and above is considerably independent in comparison to children and adolescents. This can be translated to the healthcare setting even though not exclusively often because of the nature of illnesses, mental and physical condition of an individual which influence self-care. This observation has also been backed by the fact that the hospitals inpatient department hosts a large number of the adult population from age 18 years. This is why the project seeks to provide a solution that reduces the associated health risk among this group of people.
To get make this decision; I employed an inquiry method of data collection. This involved observation of the patient and the hospital staff and their culture with regards to maintenance of hygiene standards and adherence. I also collected information from the inpatients through questionnaires and interviews. Notably, I conducted a systematic review of multiple literature materials on the hospital acquired information, the mode of transmissions, rates and impacts in the health society as well as prevention. For instance, a research by King et al. (2016), notes that the CDC published revised guidelines and policies in 2002 on handwashing practices in healthcare settings that all healthcare organizations are required to adhere to.
Through the literature material examined, secondary and primary research conducted, multiple findings were obtained. This includes the global and national statistics of HAIs and the involvement role of CDC and WHO in prevention. In addition, the pathology and impacts as well as the rates of spread have been obtained from the research (Haverstick et al., 2017).. This has given more insight regarding the illnesses and the impacts of prevention through handwashing using water. Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review. Adegboye et al. (2018) describe HAIs as infections that develop within 48 hours or more after admission in a healthcare setting or 30 days after receiving care. He also notes that the infections are of public health significance since they contribute to mortalities, morbidities, increased costs of care, prolonged admissions and pose a threat to the safety of patients. On the other hand, King et al. (2016) identifies poor practices of hand hygiene among medical staff as the major contributor to high incidences of HAIs.
The limitation of the research was limited evidence-based literature material whereby only few researchers have examined HIAs and the impact of handwashing with water over the use of sanitizers. This calls for further research in the future to ensure that the subject is extensively assessed in an effort to prevent the acquisition of HAIs.
 
References
Adegboye, M. B., Zakari, S., Ahmed, B. A., & Olufemi, G. H. (2018). Knowledge, awareness, and practice of infection control by health care workers in the intensive care units of a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. African health sciences, 18(1), 72-78. Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
Fox, C., Wavra, T., Drake, D. A., Mulligan, D., Bennett, Y. P., Nelson, C., … & Bader, M. K. (2015). Use of a patient hand hygiene protocol to reduce hospital-acquired infections and improve nurses’ hand washing. American Journal of Critical Care, 24(3), 216-224.
Haverstick, S., Goodrich, C., Freeman, R., James, S., Kullar, R., & Ahrens, M. (2017). Patients’ handwashing and reducing hospital-acquired infection. Critical care nurse, 37(3), e1-e8.
Keller, M., McMillion, A., & Ammon, A. (2018). 305 Battling the Bugs: Reducing Hospital-Acquired Infections Through Interprofessional Collaboration. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 39(suppl_1), S122-S122.
King, D., Vlaev, I., Everett-Thomas, R., Fitzpatrick, M., Darzi, A., & Birnbach, D. J. (2016). “Priming” hand hygiene compliance in clinical environments. Health Psychology, 35(1), 96. Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review


IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing

IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing
IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing
IOM Report
Different entities in the medical field have put efforts to try and improve the condition in terms of the advancement in the nursing workforce, nursing practice and education. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Committee Initiative is an entity that venture in deliberations of this kind. The essence of this paper is to describe Robert Wood Johnson foundation contributions to the issues in the medical field. It highlights the benefits of the Institute of Medicine. Also, the paper gives an overview of Arizona action coalitions. IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Committee Initiative was a wise idea towards directing the whole outline for work. The initiative aimed at the search for a completely reformed health care system to speak about the United States health care concerns. Based on the present day debate about the Affordable Care Act in Congress, there was a necessity and claim for quality care. Therefore, the foundation decided to enhance health care access to culturally diverse residents in the United States. The foundation was a shareholder in the health care industry.  It believed that health care providers need support in their roles. Particularly, it influenced nurses’ roles from the pharmacists and primary. Subsequently, in their report “Future of Nursing”, IOM and the foundation foresee a future that has primary care and prevention as the key facilitators of the health care system (Fineberg & Lavizzo-Mourey, 2013). The foundation committee and IOM concede that certain health elements must be reformed such as the nursing profession. The nursing workforce has the most significant percentage of people in health sector.
BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Place your order now, we write everything from scratch
The foundation approached the Institute of Medicine to create and begin a strategy based on the future of nursing. They released a report that recommended for action-based solution for future nursing. The action-based solution was to involve an adjustment in the institutional and public rules at the local and national levels. The committee, in their report, suggested specific actions after the examination. The actions were to point out the important roles of nurses in designing and enacting an effective and efficient health care delivery system (Fineberg & Lavizzo-Mourey, 2013). The Robert Wood Foundation further proposed understanding nurses’ roles in the context of societal issues, workforce sector, present, and future technology. Also, the committee noted about growing the nursing faculty by restructuring the whole nursing education and the capacity in nursing school to produce adequate and competent nurses. In doing so, they would cater to the present and future concerns in health. Examination of health professional education and health care delivery solution’s with improvement element is considered a main feature in the recommendation list. Lastly, the committee was concerned with attracting and sustaining well-baked nurses in the health care settings.
IOM took note of the above commendation after concurring and appreciating the unique roles of nurses within the healthcare settings. IOM report is important to nursing practice because nurses are the health care providers who spend the most time with patients and stay close to them (Dzau, 2016). Nurses have the scientific comprehension of health care procedures in the healthcare field. With that, they can redesign and improve the health care system. For a fact, the commendation had the intention of decreasing the gap between coverage and access. IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing.
The first main message from the IOM report suggested that advanced practice registered nurses ought to perform their duties to the maximum magnitude of their training and education. Most nurses work as a registered nurse. Some of the registered nurses are advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) having passed certification examination. The committee awards licenses to nurse anesthetists, clinical nurse specialists, and nurse practitioners. The report also challenged the strict nursing practice and licensing rules that vary depending on the state. IOM did not exempt the rule concerning the practice scope that defined roles of a qualified nurse. IOM is significant to nursing practice since it provides recommendations for shareholders from the department of state lawmakers to uphold that nurses can conduct their responsibility to the full capability of their education and schooling (Borger, 2012). The government influences the transformation of the initially recommended regulations on the range of practice by giving incentives to adopt better practices.
With relation to nursing education, the IOM report set a goal with the purpose of expanding the index of the baccalaureate of nurses to eighty-six percent by 2025 (Kershaw, 2012). Also, it aims at elevating the number of nurse staff with a doctorate that would represent the demand from a more educated workforce to take care of the present and future population. IOM dwells on forming student-centered policies. The policies comprise of common curriculums and standard competencies. As a result of such policies, nurses with the will to continue with their education do need to refresh themselves on some of the courses. Leadership has realized the need for more nurse practitioners. IOM also has engaged the American Nurses Credentialing Center to commence providing a plan that boosts the numerical figures of baccalaureates prepared nurses.
In nursing workforce development, the Institute of Medicine has displayed undoubted significance in its provision. The report recommends a better-quality infrastructure and explores workforce information as a requirement for assessment by the workforce (Fineberg & Lavizzo-Mourey, 2013). Besides, the report assigned the formation of a National Health Workforce to help approximate the claims from health care workers. It supports the nursing staff in data collection. IOM also has enabled the monitoring of the recruitment of healthcare providers across many disciplines.
The initiatives in Arizona Action Coalition are the campaign for patient-centered health care and action to facilitate the provision of high-quality care, with nurses practicing to their maximum capacity. Arizona also works to enact the commendations of the IOM report. The campaign functions to create and sustain reforms required for improvement in health care for all United States citizens. One barrier to the advancement in Arizona is the high turnover rate of nurses. A majority of nurses below fifty years leave the healthcare profession because of reasons such as family and personal issues, or burnout during the profession. Nursing advocates should suggest that the scope for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses’ be widen in a manner that they could perform their duties to the full degree of learning and schooling in spite of variations of policies in different states. By doing so, nurses’ duties would be decreased hence, patients would get more quality efficient care. Since the patient is an essential individual in healthcare, he or she should get care at the optimum level. Also, Arizona can retain nurses if it eases the ability of nurses to acquire advanced degrees as they work. Accessibility of education would heighten their competency and morale. IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing
References
Borger, A. (2012). The Institute of Medicine and the future of nursing. Journal of the Dermatology Nurses’ Association, 4(2), 87-88. doi: 10.1097/jdn.0b013e31824c5b21
Dzau, V. (2016). The Institute of Medicine: ensuring integrity and independence in scientific advice on health. The Lancet, 387(10028), 1686-1692. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00468-7
Fineberg, H., & Lavizzo-Mourey, R. (2013). The Future of Nursing: A look back at the landmark IOM Report. NAM Perspectives, 3(10). doi: 10.31478/201310a
Kershaw, B. (2012). The Future of Nursing: Leading change, advancing health Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (USA) National Academies Press the future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health £34|160pp97803091582370309158230. Nursing Management, 18(9), 10-10. doi: 10.7748/nm.18.9.10.s7
 

IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing

 

Review the IOM report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” and explore the “Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition” website. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession. IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing
Include the following:

Describe the work of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.”
Outline the four “Key Messages” that structure the IOM Report recommendations. Explain how these have transformed or influenced nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development. Provide examples.
Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.”
Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession.
Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers. IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing

You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. IOM Future of Nursing Report and Nursing


Order your Assignment today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP

X